YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
YJHVJF JFJFJFJHG JHFJF
Sommario: 1. Introduzione — 2. Il quadro giuridico europeo dei sistemi di A.I.: l’A.I.
La Corte di Giustizia, a valle del rinvio pregiudiziale promosso

tarantino@studiopicotti.com

rosamaria.vadala@univr.it

marco.mattia@univr.it

alice.baccin@univr.it

beatrice.panattoni@univr.it

tarantino@studiopicotti.com

rosamaria.vadala@univr.it

marco.mattia@univr.it

alice.baccin@univr.it

beatrice.panattoni@univr.it